Recent Faculty Research Publications 

A Size and Scale Framework for Guiding Curriculum Design and Assessment

Yi Kong, Kerrie A. Douglas, Kelsey J. Rodgers (ENE PhD '16), Heidi Diefes-Dux, Krishna Madhavan

The concepts of size and scale in nanotechnology are difficult for most beginning engineering students to grasp. Yet, guidance on the specific aspects of size and scale that should be taught and assessed is limited. This research sought to empirically develop a framework for size and scale conceptualization and provide a blueprint to guide curriculum development and assessment. Through an exploratory sequential mixed methods design, we qualitatively examined 30 teams of 119 first-year engineering students' nanotechnology-based projects to identify concepts beyond those in the literature to create a Size and Scale Framework (SSF). We then created a blueprint with associated learning objectives that can guide curriculum and assessment development. To demonstrate the utility of the SSF blueprint, an SSF-based quiz was developed and studied using classical test theory with 378 first-year engineering students. The findings categorized size and scale in terms of eight aspects: Definition, Qualitative Categorical, Qualitative Relational, Qualitative Proportional, Quantitative Absolute, Quantitative Categorical, Quantitative Relational, and Quantitative Proportional. The SSF can be applied as a blueprint for others to develop curriculum and assessment. The SSF-based quiz demonstrated acceptable properties for use with first-year engineering students. Development of the SSF-based quiz is an example of how the SSF can be applied to create a classroom quiz to assess students' size and scale knowledge in the context of nanotechnology.
 
Kong, Y., Douglas, K. A., Rodgers, K. J., Diefes-Dux, H. and Madhavan, K. (2017), A Size and Scale Framework for Guiding Curriculum Design and Assessment. J. Eng. Educ., 106: 431–453. doi:10.1002/jee.20172

If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education

Morgan Hynes, Wendy Hynes

The Maker Movement inspires people to express their creativity by making things in a self-directed and, often, collaborative learning endeavor. The excitement of the movement has spurred the development of various types of Makerspaces across the United States and the World to further enable people to make and innovate. The education community has recognized the potential for Makerspaces as learning environments that can foster interdisciplinary collaboration and self-directed learning. As such, there is much excitement to create Makerspaces within K-12 schools, libraries, colleges and universities. However, contrary to the formal design process used to build many school facilities, successful grass-roots makerspaces are most often created when those with like-minded interests come together and adapt the building around them to fit their needs. The research in this paper focuses on the design of such spaces by applying the environmental preferences predictors psychology construct. The study surveyed 276 students from art and design, engineering, and liberal arts majors to better understand their preferences as related to images of eight different Makerspaces. The results are broken down by the four predictors of preference, major, and gender. The results highlight differences among the images along with design considerations for creating spaces that welcome a broader audience.

Hynes, M. M., & Hynes, W. J. (2017). If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9412-5
 
keywords: makerspace, engineering education, design education, preference matrix, interior design 

The Expansive (Dis)Integration of Electrical Engineering Education

Brent Jesiek, Leah Jamieson 

This paper examines the history of electrical engineering education, leveraging the concept of “expansive (dis)integration” to frame a number of key trends and challenges in the field. Our account is organized historically, starting with the origins and early development of electrical engineering education beginning in the late 1800s, and then tracing out the rise of new subfields and specialties during the inter-war and post-WWII periods. The development of computer engineering as a field is given special attention as a case study in disciplinary (dis)integration, while setting the stage for a discussion of broader trends associated with the rising influence of digital techniques and technologies across electrical engineering. The final sections of this paper report on some contemporary challenges and opportunities that may further transform the field in upcoming years and decades, with particular emphasis on issues of demographic diversity and perceptions of broader relevance and impact. The approach of this paper is largely historical, drawing on a wide variety of primary and secondary source materials. It is expected that this paper will be of interest to anyone who would like to know more about the historical development of electrical engineering education, including in relation to more contemporary currents in the field.
 
Jesiek, B.K. and Jamieson, L.H.. (2017): The Expansive (Dis)Integration of Electrical Engineering Education. IEEE, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2677200

Identifying the characteristics of engineering innovativeness

Dan Ferguson, Matt Ohland, Şenay Purzer, K. Jablokow

The use of science and engineering skills to address the novel challenges of modern society through innovative solutions is regarded as an essential strategy around the world. Many of the studies on innovators, however, are not specific to engineers. To address this gap, this study explored engineers’ views of innovation and the attributes of engineers who create, develop, and implement innovations through in-depth interviews with expert engineering innovators. The study was set in an interpretivist framework and developed a socially constructed description of engineering innovativeness. Forty-five US-based expert engineering innovators were interviewed; these interviews were coded using a grounded-theory approach until categorical saturation was achieved. The results include the identification of 20 characteristics of engineering innovativeness, as well as an ‘engineer’s definition’ of an innovation and several general descriptors of ‘non-innovative’ engineers. The significance of this study comes from its use of detailed qualitative data gathered from peer-recognized innovative engineers from industry, entrepreneurial ventures, and academia to identify and define characteristics of engineering innovativeness in particular. The identification of these characteristics has implications for the training and development of engineers, for engineering team formation and management, and for programs, policies, and interventions aimed at supporting innovative behavior by engineers. 
 
Ferguson, D.M., Jablokow, K.W., Ohland, M.W., & Purzer, S. (2017): Identifying the characteristics of engineering innovativeness. Engineering Studies, DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1312419.

Predictive Data Analytic Approaches for Characterizing Behaviors in a Design-Build-Fly Aerospace and Aeronautical Capstone Design Course

Krishna Madhavan, M. Richey and B. McPherson

Predictive data models and interactive visualizations can be highly effective in understanding workload and skills assignment issues within design-build-fly teams in the aerospace industry. Capturing data that is needed to build predictive models in usable forms and then subsequently applying appropriate data mining techniques to derive insights from such data is a significant challenge. The ultimate goal of our work is to understand design behaviors among engineers that can lead to cost reductions and expediting product development in extremely complex engineering environments. The present study, pioneered by a large US aerospace company working with educators at 5 major engineering schools in the US, engineering education researchers, and practicing engineers, is a first step towards achieving this overall vision. In this paper, we characterize how engineering students enrolled in a senior capstone course interact and perform on complex engineering tasks commonly seen in the aerospace industry. We describe our instrumentation methodology and the data architecture for an associated analytics platform. We use course clickstreams, social networking and collaborations as the basis for our observations. 

Madhavan, K., Richey, M., & McPherson, B. “Predictive Data Analytic Approaches for Characterizing Behaviors in a Design-Build-Fly Aerospace and Aeronautical Capstone Design Course.” Computers in Education, 8(1), pp. 37 – 50. (2017).


Learners in Advanced Nanotechnology MOOCs: Understanding their Intention and Motivation

Kerrie Douglas, Nathan Hicks, Heidi Diefes-Dux, Krishna Madhavan, B.P. Mihalec-Adkins and P. Bermel

Very little is known about the specific types of learners and their various needs and intentions with regards to STEM-related MOOCs. As MOOCs become increasingly popular and completion rates stay in the single digits, it is important to understand who is enrolling in MOOCs, what is motivating them to do so, and what they want from the courses. Results from a survey of 1,624 learners enrolled in three highly-technical STEM MOOCs revealed that while learners are coming from a variety of backgrounds, 64% of respondents indicated engineering or architecture as their primary field of study. In addition, 47% indicated desire to apply information obtained to an engineering project, and 29% desired to obtain a deep level of knowledge. These findings suggest that MOOCs can be marketed as professional development of working engineers and dissemination of highly technical information. 

Douglas, K.A.*, Mihalec-Adkins, B.P.*, Hicks, N.M.*, Diefes-Dux, H.A., Bermel, P., & Madhavan, K.  “Learners in Advanced Nanotechnology MOOCs: Understanding their Intention and Motivation.” Computers in Education, 8(1), pp. 94 – 105. (2017).


Pushing and pulling Sara: A case study of the contrasting influences of high school and university experiences on engineering agency, identity, and participation

Allison Godwin and G. Potvin

This manuscript reports a longitudinal case study of how one woman, Sara, who had previously considered dropping out of high school, authored strong mathematics and science identities and purposefully exhibited agency through her experiences in high school science. These experiences empowered her to choose an engineering major in college; however, her introductory university engineering experiences ultimately pushed her out of engineering. Drawing on critical agency theory, we argue that by paying careful attention to how and why women author their identities and build agency through their experiences in high school, we may gain insight into why women may choose an engineering path in college. Additionally, we examine how Sara's perceptions of engineering structures and practices chipped away at the critical engineering agency she developed and caused her to leave engineering after her first year in college.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 54 (4), p. 439-462


Estimating a missing examination score (PDF) 

Michael Loui and Athena Lin

In science and engineering courses, instructors administer multiple examinations as major assessments of students’ learning. When a student is unable to take an exam, the instructor might estimate the missing exam score to calculate the student’s course grade. Using exam score data from multiple offerings of two large courses at a public university, we compared the accuracy of four methods to estimate an exam score, including linear regression methods. To measure accuracy, we calculated the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). We found that the NRMSE values for linear models with equal weights were close to the NRMSE values for ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models. For both the OLS and equal weight models, using normalized exam scores generally yielded more accurate estimates than using raw exam scores. The results indicate that instructors should use the equal weight model with normalized scores to estimate a missing exam score.
 
Journal of College Science Teaching, 46 (4), 18-23

From interest to decision: A comparative exploration of student attitudes and pathways to co-op programs in the United States and the United Kingdom

Nichole Ramirez, Beata Strubel, Matt Ohland, and Joyce Main

Cooperative education programs (co-op) play a vital role in developing engineering and computing students’ applied technological skills and professional self-confidence. Nevertheless, not all students choose to participate in co-ops. Through empirical data collection undertaken at two universities, this article explores students’ perceptions about co-op programs and why some students do not participate in optional co-op programs. The 408 participants were in one of three groups: (a) co-op participants, (b) interested applicants and non-applicants, or (c) those not interested and/or did not apply. Using Rational Choice Theory as an interpretive framework, quantitative and qualitative analyses of surveys and interviews were used to compare and contrast experiences, approaches, motivations and attitudes across student groups in the United States and the United Kingdom. Results show that US and UK students who identified as not being
interested in co-op shared similar perceptions, including the perceived cost of additional time to graduation. Students also expressed concern that taking time away from campus to complete a co-op would affect social interactions with their peers. The results of this work can be used to inform co-op program processes and policies, highlighting ways in which programs can increase participation. The study also shows how key stakeholders can learn cross-cultural ‘best practices’ to make co-op education accessible and effective.
 
International Journal of Engineering Education
 
keywords: cooperative education; perceptions; student pathways; computing; engineering

Big Data Characterization of Learner Behaviour in a Highly Technical MOOC Engineering Course

Kerrie Douglas, Peter Bermel, Md Monzurul Alam and Krishna Madhavan

MOOCs attract a large number of users with unknown diversity in terms of motivation, ability, and goals. To understand more about learners in a MOOC, the authors explored clusters of user clickstream patterns in a highly technical MOOC, Nanophotonic Modelling through the algorithm k-means++.  Five clusters of user behaviour emerged: Fully Engaged, Consistent Viewers, One-Week Engaged, Two-Week Engaged, and Sporadic users. Assessment behaviours and scores are then examined within each cluster, and found different between clusters. Nonparametric statistical test, Kruskal-Wallis yielded a significant difference between user behaviour in each cluster. To make accurate inferences about what occurs in a MOOC, a first step is to understand the patterns of user behaviour. The latent characteristics that contribute to user behaviour must be explored in future research. 

Journal of Learning Analytics, Vol 3, No 3 (2016)

keywords: MOOCs; learning analytics; assessment


Disciplinary Differences in Out-of-School High School Science Experiences and Influence on Students’ Engineering Choices

Allison Godwin, Gerhard Sonnert, and Phillip M. Sadler

Participation from a variety of students is important to the long-term growth of the engineering field. Much of the research on engineering recruitment or career choice has focused on engineering as a whole, even though engineering disciplines are varied in student participation and focus. This work examines how students’ out-of-school interests and experiences in high school predict the likelihood of choosing a career in a particular engineering discipline. Out-of-school experiences offer more unstructured ways for students to meaningfully engage with science and engineering outside of the confines of the classroom. These experiences offer opportunities to spark particular science interests not included in traditional high school science curriculum. Additionally, participation in engineering for women has been historically low. For this reason, we also examined reported differences in out-of-school experiences by gender. Our findings indicate that reported out-of-school experiences increased the odds of students choosing particular engineering disciplines. Experiences traditionally stereotyped as masculine and more often reported by men, such as tinkering, increased the odds of choosing engineering disciplines with higher representation of men. However, some experiences equally reported by men and women, such as mixing chemicals or engaging with chemistry in the kitchen or talking with friends or family about science, predicted higher odds of choosing engineering disciplines with higher representation of women (chemical, biomedical, environmental). These quantitative results are a first step in understanding how out-of-school experiences are connected to the nuanced decisions of disciplinary engineering career decisions and have implications for the way engineering faculty draw on prior experience in the classrooms and for researchers on how out-of-school activities may predict students’ long-term career decisions.

Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), Vol 6, Iss 2, No 2


Faculty Perspectives and Institutional Climate for Teaching Quality in Engineering

Jacqueline C. McNeil (ENE PhD '14)Matthew W. Ohland and Catherine E. Brawner

This paper analyzes faculty comments collected in 1997, 1999, and 2002 in surveys of engineering faculty teaching practices using thematic analysis. The objective was to see if there were common themes in the comments from faculty in supportive/unsupportive climates. Comments from a 2014 survey administration were classified by teaching practices (traditional vs. non-traditional) and institutional climate (traditional vs. non-traditional), creating four conditions. These comments were then analyzed using a collective case study approach. The study of the two collections of open-ended comments was supplemented by multinomial logistic regression of survey items from the 2014 administration relating faculty teaching practices and the institutional climate for teaching. In the historical data, faculty views of student evaluations evolved from seeing it as a negative burden to describing is as positive evidence of student learning. Faculty comments included many references to administrators who only ‘‘pay lip service’’ to the importance of teaching, although some faculty spoke positively about their campus’s commitment to quality teaching. Faculty awareness of and pressure to use student centered methods increased with time. The collective case study identified faculty in all four conditions, although they were not equally prevalent, and illustrates the experience in each condition using faculty comments.
 
International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 32, No 4
 
keywords: engineering faculty; faculty development; institutional climate

Sustainability Goals of Students Underrepresented in Engineering: An Intersectional Study

Allison Godwin, Leidy Klotz, Zahra Harari and Geoff Potvin

This paper considers the intersectionality of students’ race, ethnicity, and gender, to learn more about how various groups pursue sustainability goals through engineering. The lack of diversity in engineering is a persistent issue which hinders the development of more sustainable engineering solutions. Therefore, this paper investigates sustainability-related beliefs and career outcome expectations among engineering students who identify with groups underrepresented in the field. These topics are investigated using data from a national (United States) survey of students in introductory college courses. The survey sample was stratified by institution type and the number of enrolled students. Responses came from 6,772 individuals enrolled at 50 institutions. Data was analyzed, ethnicity, and gender using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic and linear regression. The intersectional approach to analyzing the data reveal opportunities to tailor teaching and messaging for greater diversity in engineering. For example, black females are more likely than other groups to want to address food issues in their careers while white females are no different than other groups. Results like these suggest ways to excite various populations about engineering careers, which could help attract much-needed diversity of thought to engineering for sustainability.
 
International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 32, No 4
 
keywords: underrepresented students; intersectionality; engineering; race; ethnicity; gender

 


The use of engineering design scenarios to assess students know ledge of global, societal, economic and environmental contexts

Ann McKenna, Morgan Hynes, Amy Johnson and Adam Carberry  

Product archaeology as an educational approach asks engineering students to consider and explore the broader societal and global impacts of a product's manufacturing, distribution, use, and disposal on people, economics, and the environment. This study examined the impact of product archaeology in a project-based engineering design course on student attitudes and perceptions about engineering and abilities to extend and refine knowledge about broader contexts. Two design scenarios were created: one related to dental hygiene and one related to vaccination delivery. Design scenarios were used to (1) assess knowledge of broader contexts, and (2) test variability of student responses across different contextual situations. Results from pre- to post-surveying revealed improved student perceptions of knowledge of broader contexts. Significant differences were observed between the two design scenarios. The findings support the assumption that different design scenarios elicit consideration of different contexts and design scenarios can be constructed to target specific contextual considerations.

European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 41, No 4, pp411-425

keywords: design scenarios, knowledge of broader contexts, product archaeology, project-based design, undergraduate education


Advice from My Sister: The Resilience of Black Women in STEM

Monique Ross

Association for Women in Science, Summer 2016, pp 32-35


A developmental model of research mentoring

Michael Loui and Renata Revelo

We studied mentoring relationships between undergraduate and graduate students in a summer undergraduate research program, over three years. Using a grounded theory approach, we created a model of research mentoring that describes how the roles of the mentor and the student can change. Whereas previous models of research mentoring ignored student roles and treated mentor roles as static, our model focuses on the development of the mentoring relationship over time. Our model explains how conflicts can occur if the mentor role does not match the maturity level of the student.

July 2016 issue of the journal College Teaching

keywords: advising, mentoring, model of mentoring, undergraduate research

The influence of ABET accreditation practices on faculty approaches to teaching

Matt Ohland and Jaqi McNeil

This paper investigates the effect of ABET accreditation processes on quality teaching using thematic analysis of descriptions from faculty in open-ended survey questions and logistic regression of quantitative survey questions about their pedagogy. Ordinal logistic regression related faculty perspectives on accreditation terminology and processes to faculty teaching practices. There were 43 qualitative comments about ABET accreditation and 91 quantitative survey results used in this study. Faculty had overwhelmingly negative views regarding accreditation, believing that it adds to their workload, stifles their creativity, and distracts them from other important objectives including teaching. Faculty who express various negative views of either the goals or the practice of accreditation are less likely to engage in certain student-centered teaching practices. More positively, our findings show that faculty who tend to agree with the student-outcomes focus of the ABET criteria engage in richer educational experiences—they give students more writing assignments and allow students to learn collaboratively.

International Journal of Engineering Education 32, (3A), pp 1151-1159

keywords: engineering; ABET; accreditation; teaching practices

Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice

Allison Godwin, Geoff Potvin, Zahra Hazari, and Robynne Lock

Prior to college, many students have no experience with engineering, but some ultimately choose an engineering career. Women choose engineering at lower rates than men. This article uses critical engineering agency (CEA) to understand first-year students' attitudes and self-beliefs to predict the choice of an engineering career. We investigated how first-year students' math and physics identities and students' beliefs about the ability of science to improve the world predict choice of engineering as a career and whether these beliefs differ by gender. The data were from the Sustainability and Gender in Engineering survey distributed during fall 2011 (N = 6,772). Structural equation modeling was used to understand first-year students' affective beliefs for predicting engineering career choice. Math and physics identities are important for predicting engineering choice at the beginning of college. Recognition from others and interest in a subject are positive predictors of physics and math identities. Students' performance/competence beliefs alone are negative predictors of engineering career choice but are mediated by interest and recognition from others. Student identities and agency beliefs are significant predictors of engineering career choice, explaining 20% of the variance. We also found gender differences in students' math and physics identities and agency beliefs. This article emphasizes the importance of students' recognition beliefs and the importance of agency beliefs for women in predicting engineering career choice.

Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), pp312-240


Evaluation of current assessment methods in engineering entrepreneurship education   

Senay PurzerNicholas Fila,and Kavin Nataraja

Quality assessment is an essential component of education that allows educators to support student learning and improve educational programs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current state of assessment in engineering entrepreneurship education. We identified 52 assessment instruments covered in 29 journal articles and conference proceedings that focused on engineering entrepreneurship. We evaluated these instruments using the unified theory of validity as a framework. Our analysis identified a variety of means through which entrepreneurial knowledge, skills, and attitudes are assessed in engineering. Self- or peer-report surveys, some of which were originally developed in business contexts, were the primary tool used for assessment. Another common tool was project deliverables. The assessment instruments often lacked features that can help differentiate levels of competencies and hence had limited utility for formative purposes. We argue that engineering entrepreneurship education would benefit from a system of assessment instruments designed through rigorous methods and developed to assess constructs specific to entrepreneurial engineering.

Advances in Engineering Education, 5(1), 1-27

keywords: assessment, Entrepreneurial Engineering, entrepreneurship education, literature Synthesis 


Preparing Engineers for the Workplace through Service Learning: Perceptions of EPICS Alumni

James HuffCarla Zoltowski, and Bill Oakes

Service-learning programs that emphasize engineering design have been posited to bolster the professional preparedness of engineering alumni. However, we know little about how such programs actually prepare engineers for the workplace. Nor does prior literature fully explain how characteristics of these programs affect professional preparation. This study investigates how alumni perceive the impact of one service-learning program, Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS), in preparing them for the workplace. We seek to provide empirical and theoretical foundations about how this program affected the alumni's perceptions of how they were prepared for professional practice. This investigation was an embedded, sequential mixed-methods study, which began by administering a survey to 523 participants. On the basis of survey responses, we interviewed 27 participants and conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts to describe how participants related their EPICS experiences to the workplace. The findings describe how alumni perceived the role of EPICS in preparing them for the workplace. The thematic analysis reveals how alumni perceived the nature of their preparation through three themes: EPICS was a bridge from education to practice, EPICS provided a means for gaining workplace experience, and EPICS developed a variety of professional skills. Grounded in alumni perspectives, this study demonstrates a strong link between participating in service-learning activities and navigating the complexity of the workplace. Finally, we identify three key characteristics of EPICS that are transferable to other institutions. 

Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 105, Number 1, pp 43-69


A cognitive mapping of the characteristics of engineering innovativeness with a comparative review of instruments to inform their assessment

Jessica Menold, Kathryn Jablokow, Senay PurzerDan Ferguson and Matt Ohland

Understanding, evaluating, and promoting individual innovativeness is a critical step in cultivating engineering leaders for the future. As a means of evaluating the gaps in current research related to innovativeness assessment, this paper analyzes ten measures and models of innovativeness through two lenses: (1) their internal vs. external point of reference (i.e., attribute vs. action); and (2) their relationship to key elements of cognitive function (i.e., cognitive level, style, and affect). From this review, it is clear that a comprehensive, rigorously validated psychometric instrument does not yet exist to assess the aptitudes, skills, knowledge, personal traits, and behaviors that are indicative of an innovative engineer. This work highlights the potential for such an instrument to help transform engineering education by enhancing student insights about innovation across programs. 

International Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 32, Number 1A, pp 64-83


Guest Editorial, Problems in Big Data Analytics in Learning

Krishna Madhavan and Michael C. Richey

When the National Academy of Engineering issued its grand challenges – specifically the one on “advancing personalized learning” (National Academy of Engineering, 2008) – it called for the development of new instrumentation, tools, and methodologies to bring learning closer to the learners and their personal choices. Big data plays a critical role in beginning to meet this grand challenge. A tremendous amount of data on students' learning and behavioral experiences is captured in a wide variety of institutional systems. These data range from student demographics and socio-economic backgrounds to data about academic progress and extend down to individual mouse clicks when students are accessing course materials or their time spent viewing a screen of course information. Data captured from automated software-based learning environments in combination with more traditional forms of educational data provide a unique opportunity to understand how learning occurs and to engineer these processes in unprecedented ways.

Data by themselves have only limited value. True transformation of educational ecosystems lies in converting these data into actionable intelligence (meaning insights and knowledge that enable learners and other stakeholders to act). Learning data vary significantly in modality (such as visual, auditory, and tactile) and dimensionality (range of observed characteristics). More important, the contexts from which these data are derived may vary enormously. It is this unique combination of factors that makes big data in learning such an interesting research artifact.
 
The ability to couple data about learners (actors or agents) and the system structure (courses, schools, university, or industry settings) within which they function is powerful. Many proponents of big data in learning believe that these data, considered as a single unified ecosystem, could eventually uncover the distributed nature of human cognition that is embedded in a thick network of human behaviors. The ability to shed light onto the so-called “ghost in the machine” (Koestler, 1967), where thoughts are embodied in learner actions, has a powerful appeal. In this guest editorial, we discuss the notion of big data and its potential for transforming learning and educational ecosystems.
 
Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 105, Number 1, pp 6-14

Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: a review of studies published between 2004 and 2014

Muhsin Menekse

While there has been a remarkable interest to make computer science a core K-12 academic subject in the United States, there is a shortage of K-12 computer science teachers to successfully implement computer sciences courses in schools. In order to enhance computer science teacher capacity, training programs have been offered through teacher professional development. In this study, the main goal was to systematically review the studies regarding computer science professional development to understand the scope, context, and effectiveness of these programs in the past decade (2004–2014). Based on 21 journal articles and conference proceedings, this study explored: (1) Type of professional development organization and source of funding, (2) professional development structure and participants, (3) goal of professional development and type of evaluation used, (4) specific computer science concepts and training tools used, (5) and their effectiveness to improve teacher practice and student learning.

Computer Science Education, Vol. 25, Iss. 4, 2015

keywords: teacher professional development, review study, K-12 education, computer science, programming

A Tale of Two STEMs

David Radcliffe

Dec 2015 edition of ASEE PRISM as the Last Word


Additional Resources

Key Publications by Engineering Education Faculty