PRISM Center
 
HOME PGRN PEOPLE RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS SPONSORS LINKS CONTACT US
PRISM Center
 

PGRN

PRISM Global Research Network

(est. 2001)

 

Current Research and updates from PRISM Center and Affiliates

PRISM30 Celebration
ICPR 26 Plenary: Challenges and Contributions to Intelligence and Transformative Production
Frontiers for Future Work and Factories
2020 - Celebrating Purdue College of Engineering 120 years
Agricultural Robotic Systems
Best Matching Protocol
Collaborative Decision Networks
Conflict & Error Prevention and
Detection
More...
 

Cyber-Collaborative Conflicts and Errors Prevention and Detection for Network Resilience

Objective

  • Define conflict and error (CE) states in an e-Work network
  • Develop prevention and detection (CEPD) logic
  • Identify and illustrate collaboration and validate CEPD logic with four e-Work topologies

Conflicts and errors are unavoidable disruptions in complex networks such as energy grids, supply chains, and collaborative decision support systems. We aim to design and implement real-time, AI-based algorithms for effective and efficient automated conflict and error (CE) prevention, detection, and recovery (PDR) for the resilience and security of such complex systems. The relationships of different CE play an essential role: Local CE can propagate to large-scale system damage according to CE dependencies if not handled correctly and in time. On the other hand, the structural information of the CE network can improve PDR operations. Constraint-based models are designed based on the complex network theory to define CE dependencies and provide prescriptive abstractions for real-world systems. A centralized algorithm taking advantage of network structure, a decentralized algorithm enabling parallelism with distributed PDR agents, and hybrid algorithms are designed to prevent, detect, and recover from CEs. The established and new algorithms use relationships between CE constraints to improve efficiency. Analytical studies and simulation experiments on various systems have been conducted to validate the latest algorithms and compare their performance to that of traditional algorithms. Results show that for effective PDR, new algorithms shall be used according to several performance measures: Response time, coverage ability, preventability, and damage minimization. The machine learning and alignment between algorithms and network characteristics, i.e., centralized algorithms for centralized networks and decentralized algorithms for decentralized networks, improve PDR. During the PDR operations, the collaboration between PDR agents also needs to be efficiently coordinated and optimized to minimize the potentially cascading effects of CE.

Keywords: AI-based Collaborative control, Complex systems, Detection algorithms, Error detection, Network topologies, Prevention

  1. Sixteen CE states
  2. Six types of e-collaboration
  3. Centralized/decentralized CEPD logic
  4. Formalized with agent-oriented, constraint-based Petri Nets
  5. Validation with four e-Work topologies

Recent organizations involved

IN 21stC S&T, TAP Companies, General Motors, Kimberly-Clark , DOD, companies.

Sample Publications

Chen, X. W. and Nof, S. Y. (2012), Agent-based error prevention algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 1 (2012), 280-287.

Xin W. Chen, Shimon Y. Nof: Conflict and error prevention and detection in complex networks. Automatica 48(5): 770-778 (2012)

Chen, X.W., and Nof, S.Y. Constraint-based conflict and error management, Engineering Optimization, 44(7), 2012, 821-841.

Xin W. Chen, Steven J. Landry, Shimon Y. Nof: A framework ofenroute air traffic conflict detection and resolution through complex network analysis. Computers in Industry 62(8-9): 787-794 (2011)

Landry, S. J., Chen, X. W., & Nof, S. Y. (2013). A decision support methodology for dynamic taxiway and runway conflict prevention. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 165-174.

Zhong, H., Nof, S. Y., Filip, F. G. (2014) Dynamic Lines of Collaboration in CPS Disruption Response, 19th IFAC World Congress, August 24-29, 2014, Cape Town, South Africa.

Rodrigo Reyes Levalle, Resilience by Teaming in Supply Chains and Networks, 2018, Springer ACES Series, Vol. 5

Xin W. Chen, Network Science Models for Data Analytics Automation: Theories and Applications, 2022, Springer ACES Series, Vol. 9

Hao Zhong, Shimon Y. Nof, Dynamic Lines of Collaboration: Disruption Handling & Control, 2020, Springer ACES Series, Vol. 6

Chen, X.W., and Nof, S.Y., Automating Prognostics and Prevention of Error, conflicts, and Disruptions, chapter 22 in Springer Handbook of Automation, 2nd Edition, 2023, 509-531.

Reyes Levalle, R. and Nof, S.Y., Resilience in supply networks: Definition, dimensions, and levels, Annual Reviews in Control, 43, 2017, 224-236.

Reyes Levalle, R., and Nof, S.Y. Resilience by Teaming in Supply Network Formation and Re-Configuration. Int. J. Production Economics 160, 2015, 80 93.

Nguyen, W.P.V., and Nof, S.Y. Resilience Informatics for Cyber-augmented Manufacturing Networks (CMN): Centrality, Flow, and Disruption, Studies in Informatics and Control, 27(4), 2018, 377-384.

Nguyen, W.P.V., and Nof, S.Y. Collaborative response to disruption propagation (CRDP) in cyber-physical systems and complex networks, Decision Support Systems, 117, 2019, 1-13.

Nguyen, W.P.V., and Nof, S.Y. Strategic lines of collaboration in response to disruption propagation (CRDP) through cyber-physical systems. Int. J. Production Economics, 230, p. 107865, 2020.

Contact: Churchill Sandana (csandana@purdue.edu)

 

PRISM Center
PRISM Center, Purdue University. West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
© 1991- PRISM Center