|
CE361 Introduction to Transportation Engineering |
Out: |
|
Homework 5 |
Due: |
HIGHWAY SAFETY AND PROJECT EVALUATION
Dear Consultant:
Traffic safety can be an emotional issue. Identifying hazardous locations and deciding where to apply limited finds must withstand the scrutiny of concerned citizens. In this HW, you will be asked to implement certain elements of the Highway Safety Improvement Program framework (CNotes Figure 6.4). Please complete the exercises below completely and clearly. You may work in a group of CE361 students not to exceed two in size. The usual rules about signatures and labeling each problem apply.
1.
Collect
and maintain data. Each year, local law enforcement agencies supply
the Mythaca Regional Planning Commission (MRPC) with crash data for roads and
intersections within the County.
2. Identify hazardous locations. Use Critical Rate Analysis to determine whether the sites in Problem 1 are hazardous.
A.
(10
points) Nine intersections with characteristics similar to Dewey and Gustav had
RMEV crash rates 5.9, 3.9, 3.9, 3.4, 1.5, 8.8, 7.0, 6.0, and 2.3. Use the 95 percent confidence level and
(regardless of your answer to Problem 1A) a crash rate of 6.4. Is the Dewey and Gustav intersection
hazardous?
B.
(10
points) Seven road segments with characteristics similar to the 1.8-mile
section of
3.
Conduct
engineering studies.
4. Establish project priorities.
|
Year: |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
Section 39.3 |
50.0 |
50.4 |
55.2 |
45.2 |
41.5 |
39.5 |
|
Section 8.0 |
68.5 |
67.5 |
59.9 |
27.6 |
35.9 |
46.1 |
5. Traffic Conflict Analysis. The intersection of X and Y has not had many crashes, but “everybody knows” it is dangerous. A team of observers went to the intersection for six hours to collect traffic conflict data. They observed 33 conflicts among an average of 1560 entering vehicles per hour. The 33 conflicts were categorized as shown in the table below.
|
Severity |
TTC |
ROC |
|
1 |
15 |
15 |
|
2 |
14 |
17 |
|
3 |
4 |
1 |
|
Total |
33 |
33 |